Spotted Seatrout in the Lower Laguna Madre: A Regional Approach to Restoring a World Class Fishery
The spotted seatrout (SST) fishery of the Lower Laguna Madre
(LLM) sustained by miles of remote and relatively untroubled seagrass meadows
deserves its world class reputation. Texas Parks & Wildlife Department
(TPWD) fishery monitoring data tells the tale. It was routine in the late-80's
to mid-90's for gill net catch rates (one of the primary means by which TPWD assesses
adult fish populations) in the LLM to be twice and on occasion three times that
of any other Texas bay. That is not the case today and that is the reason TPWD
fisheries managers are worried and looking for an answer.
The idea of establishing special bag and size limits for
spotted seatrout in the Lower Laguna Madre is one of those possible answers.
The idea has been the focus of a series of scoping meetings held by TPWD's
Coastal Fisheries over the summer, fall and early winter of this year. The
concept of a "regional management" approach that would set unique bag and/or
size limits for SST in the LLM was proposed for consideration because of
concern about declining populations there as populations in all other Texas
bays have steadily increased. The idea would be a significant departure from
the historic approach of keeping bag and size limits the same for a particular
species coastwide in Texas. Statewide regulations certainly has simplicity for
both law enforcement and ease of understanding by anglers as an advantage but
is it flexible enough to meet today's management challenges? The short answer
is no and the situation in the Lower Laguna Madre is an example of why a
regional management approach deserves strong consideration by the TPWD Commission.
This is part one of a two part series on the SST in the LLM
that will examine the rationale behind the proposal. Part I will focus on the
fisheries science upon which the recommendation is based and will also explore
environmental issues related to the proposal. Part II will focus on the
implications of regional management, including socio-economic considerations
and will outline the range of options being considered along with their pros
and cons.
Part I: Regional
Management of Spotted Seatrout in the LLM – The Science
The TPWD Coastal Fisheries monitoring program is widely
acknowledged as the best of its kind in the world. A recent peer review by an
independent panel of nationally recognized fisheries scientists reaffirmed that
status. Its comprehensive nature and 30-year
record makes it a powerful management tool. The outcome of management decisions
based on this database over the years has proved effective and the result has
been the restoration of a recreational fishery to levels not seen in decades.
The monitoring program is robust enough to support a regional management
approach and maintain the sound science base for decision-making that Texas
anglers expect.
The case for a regional approach to managing SST in the LLM
is a strong one based on three sets of data derived from the monitoring
program: overall population trends; spawning stock biomass; and, fish
mortality.
Population Trends.
TPWD Coastal Fisheries routinely and systematically monitor population levels
of sportfish by the use of gill nets in the spring and fall. This "fisheries
independent" data is an objective means of collecting information on adult fish
populations. It tells us what is present in the bays, both in size and
abundance. When used in conjunction with
our "fisheries dependent" methods such as creel surveys of individual anglers,
which tells us what is being landed; we have a very powerful dataset of the
overall state of a fishery.
The population trends for SST along the Texas coast have
shown a remarkable recovery since the freezes of the mid to late 1980's.
Galveston, Matagorda, and the Upper Laguna Madre (Figures 1, 2 and 3)
illustrate the statewide trend seen in all bays except the LLM. Figure 4 shows the LLM trends overlaid on the
statewide trend. The spotted seatrout fishery in the LLM has always been in a
class by itself but there has been a steady decline in gill net catch rates
since the mid-80's. Annual variations can sometime mask that trend but in the
last several years the trends have literally been coming to a point, a point
where for the first time ever SST populations in the LLM were lower that the
statewide average.
Spawning Stock
Biomass. Spawning stock biomass (total
weight of mature females within a given area) is a relatively straightforward means
of assessing the reproductive output of a fish population. For SST those are
mainly fish of two to five years of age and sixteen to twenty-four inches in
length. Some younger fish can also contribute to spawning as fifty to seventy
per cent of females are sexually mature at age one. Females typically produce
from 250,000 to a 1,000,000 eggs per spawning event and may produce from 2.5
million to 25 million eggs in a season, with larger females producing more eggs
than smaller individuals. Multiple spawning events within a protracted spawning
season (SST spawn from April to September) is a typical reproductive strategy
for a highly adaptive estuarine species. It is a strategy that helps assure the
species takes full advantage of the available habitat's carrying capacity and buffers
survival in the face of catastrophic events like freezes, red tides and even
manmade disasters such as oil spills.
Another significant characteristic of SST life history in
assessing the management implications of spawning stock biomass is the fact
that SST show great "site fidelity" to
the bay system where they were born. In contrast to red drum which will school
up in the fall and move offshore to form spawning aggregates, SST typically
spawn within their home bays or passes immediately adjacent to them. Tagging
studies have found an average movement of only ten miles for SST and about a
third of tagged fish were recaptured near the tagging site. This adherence to
specific bay systems is especially conducive to regional management approaches.
Because of these life history characteristics an assessment
of spawning stock biomass can be an important indicator for management action.
Figure 5 illustrates the disturbing trend in spawning stock biomass for LLM
spotted seatrout. This data was generated as part of the recently completed
stock assessment for SST in Texas, the first review since 2000. Because of
their reproductive strategy we are not seeing any obvious impact of reduced
spawning biomass at present. Recruitment into the LLM spotted seatrout
population remains good overall, as indicated by bag seine data collected as
part of our monitoring program. There are two concerns. If the decline in
spawning stock biomass continues at the current pace we will reach a point
where recruitment is adversely affected and recovering from that condition
would require management actions of a dramatic nature, far more severe than any
we are now contemplating. Secondly, and of immediate concern is the ability of
SST to respond to catastrophic events in the LLM like a severe freeze. Spawning
stock biomass relates directly to recovery time following such events. Every
decrease in spawning stock biomass means a longer and more uncertain recovery
of the population. The present spawning
stock is significantly lower (about 50%) than in the mid-80's when the LLM was
recovering from a series of severe freezes.
Fish Mortality. Both gill net and creel data allows a fishery
biologist to assess size class distribution of a fish population, although
creel data can be influenced by minimum or maximum length limits and also by
angler preferences. This information can provide insight into fishery mortality
and what is causing it. If fish of a particular length (i.e. age) disappear from
the population and that can be related to a specific factor(s), it can help
direct effective management action. In Figure 6, length frequency data for SST
in the LLM was summarized for the period 1985 to 2001 and 2002 to 2005. Those
periods were chosen because the last significant SST regulations were adopted
in 2002 and that seemed an appropriate break point. One problem noted by such
an analysis is with 18 inch and greater classes of SST. Beginning with that length
class, fish have been disappearing more rapidly in recent years than in the
previous sixteen year period. To a
fisheries manager this is a classic indicator of increased mortality due to
fishing pressure and regulatory action to alter bag and/or size limits can be
an effective management tool to rebuild these larger size classes.
Regional Management
of Spotted Seatrout in the LLM – The Ecosystem
The comment has been made that before we make any regulatory
changes in the LLM we need to address environmental problems that may be
affecting the fishery. The Coastal Fisheries Division of TPWD does use an
ecosystem based management approach in meeting its fisheries responsibilities. If
we cannot successfully answer environmental challenges the carrying capacity of
the LLM will diminish. The practical and most immediate impact being that TPWD
would be relegated only to allocating a continually shrinking resource to our
angling constituents through the use of bag and size limits. That is the only
regulatory authority available to TPWD. However,
it does not mean we are without tools to address ecosystem health.
Environmental
Challenges. The Lower Laguna Madre is a unique marine ecosystem, one of
largest hypersaline lagoons in the world. The 185 square miles of seagrass
meadows support a recreational fishery of world class reputation. Although it
remains relatively isolated the impact of coastal development is more and more
evident. Changing land use from ranching to intensive farming, coastal housing
development, and wastewater discharges from municipal, industrial and aquaculture
facilities challenge ecosystem health. TPWD has worked diligently with other
state and federal resource agencies to address these issues over the 20+ years of
my tenure at TPWD and we will continue to do so. In this arena TPWD has no
regulatory authority to mandate actions that would directly benefit fisheries.
That is the purview of other agencies like the TCEQ and GLO. Both of those
agencies do give great weight to such concerns but they must balance other
demands as well. TPWD remains a leader in addressing long term environmental
concerns both here and all along the coast but we do so with two caveats. One, TPWD
can only influence these broader regulatory processes within the authority
granted by the Texas legislature and two, solutions to environmental issues of
ecosystem scope can take years to effect. TPWD does its best to assure these
efforts work in concert with our regulatory authority but we will never
hesitate to act to address issues of concern where we can be effective. SST is
one of those issues.
Ecosystem Health.
It is important to note that while there are significant and even unique
environmental challenges the Lower Laguna Madre is today a healthy and
productive marine ecosystem. The most direct indicator of that condition may be
found in the very database that has generated concern about the condition of
spotted seatrout in the system. Coastal Fisheries collects a broad range of
information as part of the monitoring program. Gill nets are just one of many
including bag seines, trawls, water quality and habitat data, as well as,
angler (creel) surveys.
That data allows our biologists to analyze population trends
for a variety of species. Taken together they give an indication of ecosystem
health. Some species are more sensitive
to environmental change than others but a significant change in water quality
or some other factor that had ecosystem-wide impact would most likely be
reflected by downward trends in many species. We do not see any such evidence
in our data. There are some ecosystem level water quality / quantity issues
about which we have concern and we are working to address them. There is no
doubt that these concerns, if realized, can affect the long term health of the
LLM and may be doing so at a level we cannot yet discriminate. However, none of
these can be related to the SST issue at this time.
The LLM possesses a wide diversity of fish species. Changes
in diversity can be a very strong indicator of ecosystem health. We have seen a total of 63 different fish
species landed by anglers in the LLM over the past 5 years in our creel survey,
and our gill nets have caught a total of 69 different finfish species during
the same time period. Across the broad range of possible indicator species for
which we have trend data some are up, some are down and for some we cannot
tell. It is the normal condition one would expect for an otherwise healthy
ecosystem.
Water Circulation in
the LLM. Red drum illustrates a key point about the overall health of the
LLM, especially water circulation and presents a telling contrast to SST. Over
the last several years the LLM has been a hot spot
for anglers seeking red drum, with record numbers being caught. This trend
should continue in the LLM as TPWD data indicate continued high numbers of red
drum entering the fishery. Interestingly,
the health of the red drum fishery sheds light on a concern about water
circulation in the LLM and most particularly the impact of the diminished
Mansfield channel. Adequate water exchange is a key element to ecosystem health
in the LLM. Before the Intercoastal Waterway and manmade channels such as the
one to Port Mansfield, much of the LLM was extremely hypersaline and did not
support a sustained fishery. In contrast to much of the river-influenced Texas
coast, inflows into the LLM can come in the form of seawater which was often
less saline than that of the Laguna. Greater and more dependable water exchange
has produced better fisheries. Red drum
spawn offshore, in contrast to SST and adequate water exchange through passes
is vital to success. The condition of the red drum fishery in the LLM indicates
that water exchange, at least for ecosystem health needs, is adequate and not a
limiting factor.
If Regional
Management – What?
The analysis of existing data makes a strong case for
management action(s) to reverse the downward trends in both overall population
and especially spawning stock biomass of SST in the LLM. The question is what
specific actions make the most sense. There are a number of options and all
have their pros and cons. Part II will focus on those issues.
Part II will appear in the
next edition of Texas Saltwater Fishing...